Corporate Governance

We comply with laws and the articles of incorporation to establish an effective corporate governance system. Additionally, we are committed to safeguarding shareholders rights, ensuring equitable treatment of all shareholders, strengthening the structure and operation of the board of directors, enhancing information transparency, protecting the interests of stakeholders, and fulfilling corporate social responsibility.

Major Shareholders

2025/03/31
Name Shares
Shareholding Percentage(%)
Min Aik Technology Co., Ltd. 29,857,000 38.78%
Beacon Investment Limited (Malaysia) 22,756,000 29.55%
Taiwan Fu Hsing Industrial Co., Ltd. 1,500,000 1.95%
Wang, Chung-Chi 1,034,000 1.34%
Fang, Kuang-Yi 732,022 0.95%
UBS Europe SE Investment Account 661,063 0.86%
LGT Bank (Singapore) Ltd. 444,000 0.58%
Chia, Kin-Heng 439,766 0.57%
CTBC Bank Employee Stock Ownership Trust Account of Min Aik Precision Industrial Co., Ltd. 399,725 0.52%
Hsu, Chien-Hung 361,000 0.47%

Diversity Policy of The Board


In order to strengthen the functions of the Board, the Company's “Corporate Governance Best Practice Principles” specifies that the composition of the Board of Directors should be diversified to ensure that the Board as a whole can have operational judgment, operational management and analytical oversight capabilities, and in the Company's “Procedures for Election of Directors” Establish a policy of diversity of board members. The company’s board member diversity policy is as follows:Article 3 of “Procedures for Election of Directors”

The overall composition of the board of directors shall be taken into consideration in the selection of this Corporation's directors. The composition of the board of directors shall be determined by taking diversity into consideration and formulating an appropriate policy on diversity based on the company's business operations, operating dynamics, and development needs. It is advisable that the policy include, without being limited to, the following two general standards:

1.Basic requirements and values: Gender, age, nationality, and culture.
2.Professional knowledge and skills: A professional background (e.g., law, accounting, industry, finance, marketing, technology), professional skills, and industry experience.

Each board member shall have the necessary knowledge, skill, and experience to perform their duties; the abilities that must be present in the board as a whole are as follows:

  • The ability to make judgments about operations
  • Accounting and financial analysis ability
  • Business management ability
  • Crisis management ability
  • Knowledge of the industry
  • An international market perspective
  • Leadership ability
  • Decision-making ability

Implementation of board member diversity policy:

  1. The 10th Board of Directors of the Company consists of 4 General Directors and 3 Independent Directors. Among them, the directors with employee status accounted for 0%, female directors accounted for 0%; The 2 Independent Directors are appointed for a period of 3 years, 1 Independent Director is appointed for a period of 6 years; The 2 directors are between 61 and 70 years old, 3 directors are between 51 and 60 years old, 2 director is between 41 and 50 years old, the average age of all directors is about 56 years old. There are no spouses or relatives within the second degree of kinship among the 7 directors.
  2. Individual members have the necessary abilities to perform their duties as follows: 
         
 
  1. Specific management objectives and implementation status of the board member diversity policy:
    Diversification Specific management objectives Achievement
    Gender At least one female director
    Expertise or Background At least one qualified accountant
    At least one qualified lawyer


Management of the Prevention of Insider Trading

1.Regarding the company's management to prevent insider trading, please refer to the "Procedures for Handling Material Inside Information".

2. In order to protect the rights and interests of shareholders and implement equal treatment of shareholders, the "Internal Material Information Processing Procedures" formulated by the board of directors prohibit insiders such as directors or employees from buying and selling the company's securities as follows:

  1. If a person as defined in Article 157-1 of the Securities and Exchange Act has actual knowledge of the company's news that has a significant impact on the stock price, he shall not make any comment on the company's information after the news becomes clear, before it is made public or within 18 hours after it is made public. Buying or selling stocks or other equity securities by oneself or in the name of others.

  2. The Company's directors, managers and their related parties are not allowed to trade their stocks during the closed period of 30 days before the announcement of the annual financial report and 15 days before the announcement of the quarterly financial report. The board meeting unit shall notify each director and manager of the scheduled board meeting date, financial report date and closed period for the next year, and remind them again before each closed period.

3. Specific implementation status of preventing insider trading in 2023

(1) Arrange directors to attend relevant publicity meetings held by the competent authorities for a total of 6 people and 18 hours.
(2) Regularly educate all directors, managers and employees on the Internal Material Information Processing Procedures and the prevention of insider trading.



Ethical Corporate Management Policies

1. In order to foster a corporate culture of ethical management and sound development, our company has established the " Ethical Corporate Management Principles" as a reference framework for establishing good commercial practices. This Principle is also applicable to our subsidiaries.

2. Based on the principles of fairness, honesty, faithfulness, and transparency in business activities, and to implement the policy of ethical management while actively preventing unethical behavior, the company has established the " Procedures and Guidelines for Ethical Business Conduct," which specifically outlines the matters that employees should pay attention to when carrying out their duties.

3. Operational Service Office is authorized by the company to be responsible for developing and dealing with ethical corporate management related matters for the company and its subsidiaries, and reporting the status of performance of the previous year to the Board of Directors every year.

4. Ethical management education and training held by the company in 2023:

In 2023, the company held internal and external education and training related to ethical corporate management issues for a total of 208 people and 280 hours.
(Including employee ethics management procedures, ethics management, ethical management and compliance with laws, accounting systems and internal control and other related courses)



Communications between the independent directors, the Company's chief internal auditor and CPAs

1. All independent directors were members of the audit committee. They not only had to review the audit report of the head of internal audit periodically and communicate with the head of internal audit, but also should invite the head of internal audit to report at the meeting of the audit committee, if necessary.

2. Certified public accountants were also invited periodically to fully explain certification of financial statements of the company and relevant internal control and audit at the meeting of the audit committee.

3. Frequency of independent communication between independent directors and Head of audit and CPAs: Head of audit at least once a quarter; CPAs at least twice a year.

4. Communication situation this year:


Board Performance Evaluation

In order to implement corporate governance and enhance the Company's board functions, and to set forth performance objectives to improve the operation efficiency of the Board of Directors, the Board of Directors established the “Rules for Performance Evaluation of Board of Directors” on August 8, 2019.:

Evaluation Cycle:

  1. The Board of Directors shall conduct a self-performance evaluation annually.
  2. The Board of Directors should conduct a performance evaluation at least once every three years by an external professional independent body or external experts.

Evaluation Scope and Method:

  1. The scope of the evaluation includes the Board, Individual directors and Functional committees.
  2. Evaluation methods include internal self-evaluation of the Board, Committees, and Directors, appointment of external professional organizations, experts or other appropriate methods to conduct performance evaluation.

Execution unit:The internal evaluation unit of the Company is the agenda working group.

Evaluation procedures: At the end of each year, the executive unit collects information about the activities of the board of directors and distribute self-evaluation questionnaires such as Annex 1 to 4. The execution unit finally collects the assessment results according to the scoring standards of the evaluation indicators in Article 8 and submits them to the board of directors for discussion and improvement.

External professional institutions and experts:

  1. The external evaluation institution or panel of external experts and scholars shall be professional and independent.
  2. The external evaluation institution shall be an institution or management consulting firm mainly engaging in the provision of services for educational and training programs for board of directors and improvement of corporate governance of enterprises.
  3. The panel of external experts and scholars shall appoint at least three experts or scholars specialized in the fields of board of directors or corporate governance to conduct evaluations of board performance of the company and prepare external evaluation analysis reports.

Evaluation indexes:

  1. Board performance evaluation includes five major directions: the degree of participation in company operations, promotion quality of Board decisions, Board composition and structure, the selection and continuous training of directors, and internal control, with 45 indicators in total.
  2. The performance evaluation of individual directors includes six major directions: the control company goals and missions, knowledge to competences of director, the degree of participation in company operations, internal relationship operations and communication, professional and continuous study of director, and internal control, with 23 indicators in total.
  3. The performance evaluation of the audit committee includes five major directions: the degree of participation in company operations, knowledge to the competence of functional committees, promotion quality of functional committee decisions, the composition of functional committee and member selection, and internal control, with 22 indicators in total.
  4. The performance evaluation of the remuneration committee includes four major directions: the degree of participation in company operations, knowledge to the competence of functional committees, promotion quality of functional committee decisions, and the composition of functional committee and member selection, with 18 indicators in total.

Application of evaluation results:When the company elects or nominates board members, the election should be based on the performance evaluation results of the board of directors, and the individual directors' remuneration should be determined based on the performance evaluation results of the directors.



Board performance evaluation execution results

【Internal Evaluations】

1. The company completed the internal evaluation of the board of directors, board members and functional committees for the year at the end of 2024. Most of the average scores of the evaluation results for each aspect were between 4 and 5 points, indicating that the company's overall operation is perfect. Comply with corporate governance requirements.
2. In addition to being submitted for board discussion and improvement in the first quarter of 2025, the evaluation results will also serve as a reference for future director nominations, as well as for setting individual directors' salaries and remuneration.
3. Evaluation results:

4. Note: The total score for each evaluation is 5 points. An average score between 1 to 2 is considered "Needs Improvement," 2.1 to 3 is " Fair," 3.1 to 4 is "Good," and 4.1 to 5 is "Excellent"

【External Evaluations】


I.External professional independent institutions

1.In 2022, the company appointed the Taiwan Corporate Governance Association to evaluate the performance of the board of directors in eight major aspects: composition, guidance, authorization, supervision, communication, internal control and risk management, self-discipline and other aspects. In addition to reviewing written documents, interviews were also conducted via video conference on February 22, 2023. The Taiwan Corporate Governance Association appointed Lin, Chan-Chuan and Huang, Chen-Li as executive members, and Lu, Shu-Man and Sung, Yi-Ching as the evaluation team. Review the operation of the company's board of directors and functional committees, and conduct a professional and objective physical examination of the company through the guidance and communication of the evaluation committee.
2.The Taiwan Corporate Governance Association is an independent non-governmental/non-profit corporate body that provides professional corporate governance system assessment and board of directors effectiveness evaluation services in Taiwan.

II.Evaluations and Suggestions:

Evaluations:

1.The chairman adheres to the professional business philosophy, attaches great importance to the sustainable operation of the enterprise, actively practices the spirit of "diligence, prudence, strictness and integrity", and leads the shaping of the corporate culture by example. The chairman's leadership style is open and respectful of the opinions expressed by all directors; For important proposals, arrange the management team to communicate and explain with the directors before the meeting; The board of directors has heated discussions, full communication, detailed meeting records, rigorous follow-up management, and formed a good board discussion culture.
2.In response to the needs of your company's operation and development, the three independent directors have expertise and industry knowledge in the fields of financial accounting, law, technology and other fields, and are brave and actively engaged, which is in line with the spirit of diversity and professional division of responsibilities among the board members, which is worthy of recognition.
3.Under the guidance of the Remuneration Committee, your company formulates the "Manager's Performance Appraisal Method" based on the business plan and strategic direction, linking the manager's performance appraisal with the company's operational performance. Manager's performance indicators include the achievement of departmental budgets, the achievement of managers' key performance indicators (KPIs) and the performance of managers' professional behaviors. The Remuneration Committee regularly reviews the existing remuneration policies and systems and makes adjustments according to the operational situation to give full play to the functions of the Remuneration Committee.

4.Your company's audit supervisor submits the audit report to the independent directors on a monthly basis, and regularly reports the audit results (including the improvement of deficiencies and abnormal matters) to the audit committee and the board of directors. In addition, closed-door meetings between the audit supervisor and the members of the audit committee were held according to actual needs (three meetings in total during the evaluation period), which demonstrated the Board's intention to strengthen the independence of the audit unit and the effective performance of its functions.

Suggestions:

1.In order to pursue sustainable development, it is recommended that your company consider adding functional committees of the board of directors (such as the sustainability committee) to upgrade the supervision and governance of risk management and ESG matters to the board level, so as to strengthen the board of directors' supervision of risk control and pursue the sustainable development of the company.
2.However, in order to enhance the operational efficiency of the board of directors and actively implement the legal governance of the company, it is recommended that the company establish relevant written norms or systems to facilitate compliance. In addition, it is also recommended that your company formulate an assessment method for the competency of accountants (including the audit quality index (AQI) information provided by the accounting firm) so that the audit committee and the board of directors can evaluate the renewal of accountants every year.
3.At present, your company has announced the contact channels of independent directors on its internal website, set up a physical mailbox to listen to the opinions of employees, and also set up a special area and contact window for investors on its official website, so that it is recommended to strengthen communication with other stakeholders, and you can set up a channel (e.g. e-mail) on the official website to directly communicate with independent directors to directly obtain the dynamic information of stakeholders and make appropriate responses.

III.Follow-up:

In addition to being submitted to the board of directors for review and improvement on March 17, 2023, various suggestions from external professional independent organizations will be used as a reference for the future work goals of the company's board of directors.
 



Meetings and resolutions of the Remuneration Committee in 2024


According to the company's Remuneration Committee Charter, the Committee shall exercise the care of a good administrator to faithfully perform the following duties and present its recommendations to the board of directors for discussion:

1. Periodically reviewing this Charter and making recommendations for amendments.
2. Establishing and periodically reviewing the annual and long-term performance goals for the directors, supervisors, and managerial officers of this Corporation and the policies, systems, standards, and structure for their compensation.
3. Periodically assessing the degree to which performance goals for the directors, supervisors, and managerial officers of this Corporation have been achieved, and setting the types and amounts of their individual compensation.

The Committee shall perform the duties under the preceding paragraph in accordance with the following principles:

1. Ensuring that the compensation arrangements of this Corporation comply with applicable laws and regulations and are sufficient to recruit outstanding talent.
2. Performance assessments and compensation levels of directors, supervisors, and managerial officers shall take into account the general pay levels in the industry, the time spent by the individual and their responsibilities, the extent of goal achievement, their performance in other positions, and the compensation paid to employees holding equivalent positions in recent years. Also to be evaluated are the reasonableness of the correlation between the individual's performance and this Corporation's operational performance and future risk exposure, with respect to the achievement of short-term and long-term business goals and the financial position of this Corporation.
3. There shall be no incentive for the directors or managerial officers to pursue compensation by engaging in activities that exceed the tolerable risk level of this Corporation.
4. For directors and senior managerial officers, the percentage of bonus to be distributed based on their short-term performance and the time for payment of any variable compensation shall be decided with regard to the characteristics of the industry and the nature of this Corporation's business.
5. No member of the Committee may participate in discussion and voting when the Committee is deciding on that member's individual compensation.

Title Name Attendance in Person By Proxy Attendance Rate(%) Remarks
Independent Director Chen, John-Sea 4 0 100%
Independent Director Sun, Chu-Wei 4 0 100%
Independent Director Chung, Kai-Hsun 4 0 100%


Meetings and resolutions of the Audit Committee in 2024


The audit committee of the company held 4 meetings in 2024, and the actual attendance rate of all members was 100%. The work priorities completed this year are as follows:

1. Assessment of the effectiveness of the internal control system.
2. Asset transactions.
3. Loans of funds, endorsements, or provision of guarantees of a material nature.
4. Appointment and remuneration of CPAs, and periodic assessment of their independence and competence.
5. Annual and quarterly financial reports.
6. Other material matters as may be required by this Corporation or by the competent authority.

Title Name Attendance in Person By Proxy Attendance Rate(%) Remarks
Independent Director Chen, John-Sea 4 0 100%
Independent Director Sun, Chu-Wei 4 0 100%
Independent Director Chung, Kai-Hsun 4 0 100%